newYou can now listen to Fox News!
“This is NPR.” This slogan has been used a long time ago on the national public radio, but what remains is significantly in doubt. NPR is still something of curiosity. It is a media outlet in the country in a country that rejects government media. It is a site routinely launched for its sponsors with insisting that it does not contain commercials. This confusion may be on the way to a final decision after the elections. NPR is about to have an account with exactly what it is and what it represents.
While it appeared on NPR, it became more critical of the port because it has become a public politician in its coverage and insecurity.
Even after a respectable editor, URi Berliner wrote Scathing account Among the political bias in NPR, The Outlet has doubled on its unilateral coverage and suspension. In fact, while you strongly address the left and support public accounts (including Some wrong storiesFrom democratic sources, NPR rejected criticism. When many of us called for NPR to choose the most partisanis Executive Chairman, I instead chose Catherine Maher, which was Previously criticized For her severe political opinions.
Some have long questioned the federal government's support for a media organization. NPR does not continue to keep it.Federal financing is necessary“For its work. However, this country has long rejected government media models as undermining democratic values.
Ukraine – 2023/04/17: In this illustrative form, the national public radio logo (NPR) was seen on a smartphone and on the computer screen. (Clarification of photos by Pavlo Gonchaar/SOPA photos/Lightrockwal via Getty Images)
(Getty Images)
This funding is likely to be more important, given profit. the NPR fans have decreased for years. As a result, NPR was forced to make Deep employee discounts.
Ironically, NPR has one of the least diverse audiences in the media. Its listeners are an overwhelming majority White, liberal, and richer From the rest of the country. However, while providing fewer people and their lowest number, most country is still expected to support its programs.
Many of us have Argue NPR should compete with other radio companies in the free market. It is worth noting that some Democratic leaders have pushed to obtain Fox News from news transport companies despite the fact that they are not supported by the government and are ranked continuous as the most viewed cable news network. (For full detection, I am a legal analyst in Fox.)
NPR and PBS face calls to remove support at the end. However, at the same time, pressure comes from the Federal Communications Committee. The Federal Communications Committee Chairman Brendan Carr inquires that NPR claims that it does not do commercials.
Catherine Maher, CEO of NPR, was significantly challenged during the rare general recognition of the allegations of the editor Uri Berliner for a long time that the General News Organization lacked the “diversity of the point of view” and the meeting of the liberal public. (Fox News)
Many of us have noticed that NPR has increased its sponsoring phrases with interface lines around products or company customers. Car wrote, “I am concerned that NPR and PBS broadcasts can violate federal law by broadcasting commercials. In particular, NPR and PBS members can broadcast subscription ads that cross the line to banned commercial ads.”
Support for Non -commercial radio and television stations It fell under different regulations. It is difficult to see the sponsor confessions as anything other than the commercial advertisement. It is common to have profitable outlets that make hosts read commercial shepherds.
Under Article 39 B of the Communications Law of commercial ads or other promotional ads prohibits on behalf of profitable entities.
Interestingly is that NPR Pressure In sponsoring guidelines that “NPR WAY” is actually a better way to reach consumers:
“Through platforms, NPR care messages are subject to a little different regulations, but the guideline is the same: the instructions are no less than the” permitted “and more about the approach that works better for brands to formulate the identification messages of the sponsor that connects to the people in the” NPR “,” Read Guidance.
What is noticeable is how the NPR audience is frankly opposed to any effort to cut out public benefits. While rejecting half of the country's values or opinions, they expect these citizens to support its programs.
It is common for law firms or companies to have their work hosts in certain fields. It is also common to be Product reference.
Pushing the NPR stadium for advertisers is that this is a different type of stadium to attract more customers. However, the federal government claims that this is not really a commercial stadium at all.
There is no big difference between NPR and competitors that go beyond demonstration when it comes to bias or promotions. What is noticeable is how the NPR audience is frankly opposed to any effort to cut out public benefits. While rejecting half of the country's values or opinions, they expect these citizens to support its programs. What would the reaction be if Congress requests the same support for the most popular competitors like Radio Fox?
I would like to oppose Fox support as I do for NPR. Each port should depend on watching it for support. It is worth noting that many liberal outlets still maintain their biased coverage despite the decrease in categories and revenues. Washington Post has I had to lay off the employees again It has lost nearly half of the readers.
After he was called to the right, the Washington Post publisher and CEO William Lewis handed over the truth bomb in the middle of the newsroom Tell the employees“Let's not get it … We lose large sums of money. Your audience has decreased to half in recent years. People do not read your belongings. Isn't it? I can no longer sugar.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
However, the book In Los Angeles Times And other ports continue to argue against balanced coverage. They prefer to lose readers and revenues from their bias. Let it be. These outlets have all the right to provide obligatory views or coverage. They do not have the right to federal support to isolate them from the response of consumers.
It is time to create a bright base against government subsidies for the favorite media. “This is NPR” but it is not the one we must be as a nation.
Click here to read more Jonathan Torley
