Australian legend Ian Chappell has criticized the International Cricket Council (ICC), describing it as an “event management company” that fails to manage cricket effectively. Ian Chappell urged the ICC to focus on proper management of the game and called for the implementation of a two-tier system in Tests.
According to reports, a two-division system could be introduced in Test cricket after the current Futures Tours program ends in 2027. This structure will allow the “Big Three” teams – Australia, England and India – to compete against each other twice each time. Three years, instead of playing twice every four years.
ICC is widely viewed as an event management company – Ian Chappell
In his column for ESPNCricinfo, Ian Chappell called for stricter criteria for being granted Test status. He said the ICC must ensure that the country “enjoys viable top-tier competition, a legitimate ground to hold five-day games with adequate facilities, and is financially stable,” using Afghanistan as an example.
Chappell questioned their ability to host Test matches due to ongoing political instability and inadequate infrastructure. He also noted that Ireland lacks sufficient testing venues. Chappell described the ICC as an “event management company,” adding that it was not even a competent company.
“For example, could Afghanistan hold a Test series in its conflict-torn country? Does Ireland have a realistic number of standard Test grounds? Even putting aside the Taliban's abhorrent treatment of women, the answer to these questions is: absolutely not. So why?” Have a test case? Chappelle wrote.
He added: “Because in exchange for a test case they provide valuable voices to the ICC on important issues. The ICC is widely viewed as an event management company. 'Not a very good company,' they should add.”
The Big Three demand a big share of the money – Ian Chappell
Chappell backed Michael Houlding's opposition to the proposed two-tier cricket Test system but highlighted concerns about its potential to widen the financial gap between member nations. He pointed out that the “Big Three” – India, Australia and England – have to play more Tests against each other.
“The ICC does not run cricket, and unless there is a major change of heart, financially desirable nations will continue to have a significant role in producing a self-serving schedule. Then there is the key issue of financial division,” Chappell wrote. .
“The Big Three – India, Australia and England – despite being the richest cricketing nations, claim a significant portion of the money divided between cricketing bodies, yet are seeking a larger share. India's strong presence in the ICC is in direct proportion He added: “Their contribution of around 70% of cricket's income is a complex issue for which cricket has not found a workable solution.”
There has been a significant increase in test matching results – Ian Chappell
The 81-year-old noted that teams now prefer fast-scoring batsmen to meet the demand for recreational cricket. Chappell pointed to the increase in Test match scores and the improvement of the grounds, adding that Test cricket was doing well to remain relevant in the modern era.
“There has been a significant increase in Test match scores and more acceptable pitches, highlighting the importance of bowlers in providing a good spectacle. There is also a greater focus on playing recreational cricket. Despite facing various challenges, Test cricket is doing a creditable job in keeping On the relevant coordination,” he concluded.
Read also: Richard Illingworth has been named the 2024 ICC Referee of the Year
