Digest opened free editor
Rola Khaleda, FT editor, chooses her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
Charlotte Tilby, British fashion makeup artist who created a billion dollar brand, is sure that unique cosmetics are unique. “I have tried a lot of brands to copy, but darling, you cannot falsify the feeling of Tilbury,” and it is a pledge in a new campaign that glorifies a collection “that cannot be viable.”
Only. Tilbury ascending To become one of the leading cosmetics brands in the United Kingdom, the United States and other countries, it has provided many imitators. There is now an industry of cheaper deception (repetitions) of its best products, from a flawless Hollywood candidate to a pensagach light stick and magic moisturizer Charlotte magic.
Companies like Mcobeaunty and ELF create deception Charlotte Tilberry (And other brands) that are supported by social media, who are eager to get a tilbury looking for less. While a bottle of Hollywood candidate is not flawless selling $ 49 in the United States, the irreplaceable MCO glow costs only $ 14.99.
Do not imagine Tilberry that it is imitated. Mcobeauty, an Australian company, is frankly trying to match the higher cosmetic products and offer them in the package that looks very close to the original. Her lawyers examine her commercial brands and design rights before designing a similar glow bottle, but they are legal, not flawed.
Mcobeauty is not alone. The deception, or the standard measurement of the product, as it is known as literature, is the basic pillar of food and drink industries, and now from cosmetics. It is also an essential strategy for a discount like Aldi and Costco, which often sells special labels from brand products.
Distinguished brands such as Charlotte Tilberry, which is Majority By the Spanish fragrance company and Puig cosmetics, it faces a continuous battle against “excessive” deception. The latter is the term competitors who make products that seem similar to the extent that they deceive shoppers to believe that they are identical.
Brand owners won a victory last week when he won the Hatchers by violating the brands against Aldi over the lemon apple juice, the last mark of the last mark and its package. The Court of Appeal ruled that although shopping in Aldi was not confused in the belief that he was a producer from that chasers, the retail seller has gained an unfair advantage by evoking the Somerset Cider product.
Cosmetics are particularly vulnerable to warming, thanks to the visual effect of Tiktok and Instagram. The brand of the discount does not need to risk legal violation by claiming publicly to repeat a product: social media users will do so on behalf of this, and often with videos of how to compare products, on the price in addition to quality.
This Charlotte Tilberry did not harm much: its sales were reported in the United Kingdom in 2023 more than twice that in 2020, when Puig took its share. But she had enough. “The law does not protect enough brands like us. If the United Kingdom does not care about companies that open new reasons, how will the economy grow?” Says CEO Dimitra Bennsant.
The company has previously taken legal measures, and won the issue of copyright in the United Kingdom against Aldi in 2019 due to the design of the retail stores of the makeup plate that the Supreme Court ruled was very close to the Filmstar Bronze and Glow panel. But it may be difficult to enforce rights: Elf has just won a case in California in which she was accused of violating brands with Dubai Mascara.
Patents on cosmetic formulas, such as those exposed to new drugs, will be easier to support. Charlotte Tilby says that its products contain some unique ingredients, and have stopped temporarily from a flawless Hollywood candidate when one of them ran out. But it is difficult to prove that cosmetics is a patented invention, not just a new cooking.
Last week's referee will help brands. The ruling that Aldi “rode on the tails of the coat” for the marketing budget that creates a friction of the retail plan. “This changes things for any supermarket sailing near the wind,” says Thomas Sharters Mayor, a partner in Stevens Skkon, a law firm who represented the straw.
Charlotte Tilberry “legendary. For some reason” a campaign has a broader purpose. Regardless of the legal procedure that it takes, it also needs to gain hearts and minds, and it is clear from social media that many of its fans do not see a mistake with others who are trying to imitate their products. The combustion is not only spreading, but it is common.
Trademarks need a story as well as a set of property rights to make their case. But the fact that others are doing the effort to deceive their products has a reassuring side. When the imitators move to other brands, the time will be truly the Charlotte Telepieri concern.
