Blake Levli, Justin Baldouni.
Getty Images (2)Blake Blake Allegedly He does not want to be removed by Justin Balounilawyer , Bian Friedman.
According to the court documents you obtained US weeklylawyer Kevin Fritz – The 41 -year -old deny, and his studio Warr – wrote to the judge on Thursday, January 30. In the letter, Fritz claimed this vital, 37, and her husband Ryan Reynolds Friedman objected to her testimony.
“Specifically, the lawyer of the biological parties indicated that they object to Brian J “When the details were asked for their objection, the lawyer of the vital parties refused to do so.”
According to Fritz, Livly's lawyer explained that the actress does not want to hold the session with Friedman. However, Fritz and his team argued that he should not have an opinion on whoever is deposited.
War of words between Justin Baldoni and Blake Levli does not show any sign of stopping. The Brayan Friedman's lawyer has issued a fiery response to Lively's allegations that he is trying to distort the jury gathering in his upcoming trial, especially by leaking information in an attempt to refute the actress from the story. (…)
“We are not aware of any position that would require the deposed party to have an option in which the lawyer takes deposit,” continued the deposit. “The parties do not have the simplicity of the dictation of any of their opponents' lawyer who may take or do not take their deposit or perform any other side of the opposition party.”
Fritz stated that since Lively or Baldoni lawyer cannot agree on the issue they are asking the court to weigh at their conference scheduled for Monday, February 3.
This is not the only development in the ongoing legal drama between inferior and vitality. On Thursday, Levli and Reynolds, 48, told a federal judge that they were You seek to separate A defamation suit, filed on the same day.
She played the role of vibrant and Baldoni End with usThat was first offered in August 2024. It is common at a time Tension between the husband After they did not promote the movie together.
Four months later, A lawsuit against the bloggingThe film also directed, for sexual harassment and accused him of launching the “social manipulation” campaign against it “to destroy” its reputation.
Baldoni denied all the allegations that I had against him in the lawsuit. The actor later Take legal measures against New York Times To cover the charges of Levli. Spokesman New York Times He said we The port is planning to “defend strongly against the lawsuit.”
Then I filed a lawsuit against Reynolds and Lavelli Leslie Sloan. in 400 million dollars a lawsuitHe accused the civil extortion group, defamation, the wrong invasion of privacy and more.
Brian Friedman, Justin's lawyer, responded to the blog of Blake Livley's request to obtain a gag something in the ongoing legal case about filming it. “The paradox has not been lost on anyone that Mrs. Levli is so vibrant from the truth that she moved to his luxury,” Friedman (…)
Earlier this month, Friedman Illuminated footage has been released From the group End with us – A scene mentioned in each of the lawsuits. In addition to making the clip available to the public, the Baldoni Legal team also said they were Web site This would support the manager's claims against vitality. Vital, on its part, Criticize without And his team for their decision to publicly share the video through its legal team.
The legal team in Levli said in a statement to we On January 21. “This issue is in an active lawsuit in the Federal Court. The launch of this video to the media, rather than presenting it as a guide in the court, is another example of an unethical attempt to manipulate the public. It is also a continuation of the campaign of harassment and revenge. While they focus on the narratives of the misleading media We are focusing on the legal process.
we She later confirmed that Lively and Reynolds had made a letter in court Searching for a preventive matter To prevent Friedman from being involved in “inappropriate behavior”, including the “harassment and revenge media campaign” against the spouses.
