Open the White House Watch newsletter for free
Your guide to what the 2024 US elections mean for Washington and the world
The shooting death of Brian Thompson, CEO of America's largest health insurance company, in Manhattan last week sent shivers through boardrooms in the United States. The suspect accused of killing a UnitedHealthcare CEO was found Monday with a handwritten statement outlining “some ill will toward corporate America,” according to officials. After an election campaign marred by two attempts on the life of Donald Trump, the killing represents another example of how individuals take out their frustrations through violence, this time against a business figure.
Fortunately, physical attacks on senior executives are rare. However, discontent over America's plethora of social ills – one of the developed world's most unequal societies – has long made corporations, as well as politicians, targets of ire. Although this is usually expressed peacefully, activism on both the left and right has turned increasingly violent. by some measures, Political violence in the United States is at its highest levels in several decades. The country's polarized and toxic rhetoric, sometimes fueled by social media, is partly to blame.
Thompson's murder reveals the extent of anger toward the health care system in the United States in particular. Many complain of difficulties in obtaining affordable insurance coverage and denial of certain treatments. In July, about 100 people gathered outside UnitedHealthcare's headquarters in part to protest the way the company reviews treatments before agreeing to pay for them. The words “deny”, “defend” and “isolate” It was discovered On bullet casings at the scene of Thompson's killing, an apparent reference to criticism of the methods of insurance companies.
No matter how deep-rooted frustrations are, nothing justifies resorting to violence, or condoning it. It is unfortunate that a large minority believes otherwise. One in five Americans believe that violence is the solution to internal political divisions. In reality, Cool reaction Thompson's murder on social media is troubling. Suspect Videos have emerged of people dressed like the alleged killer.
This normalization of violence means that big corporations cannot be satisfied with executive security. The proportion of large US companies providing security to at least one executive has risen slight In recent years to more than one in four. Many technology and oil company executives – who are often subject to public criticism – have personal security and monitoring available to their families. Meta spent $23 million on security for Mark Zuckerberg last year. The fact that Thompson had no security detail when he was shot during rush hour should raise questions. His widow says he has faced threats before.
For better or worse, the demands on CEOs have risen over time. Expectations now extend from generating returns for shareholders to dealing with the social, political and environmental impacts of their businesses. This has come alongside pressure on CEOs to be the most visible faces of their companies, just as social media has made business leaders more accessible to the public.
Naturally, executives are well rewarded for dealing with these pressures. But in America's gun-toting society, it may only be a matter of time before raw public rhetoric turns persistent anger toward industry and the executive class into violent vigilante action. That corporate America is now Scramble for evaluation If senior staff have adequate security it is a sad but necessary sign of the times.
