newYou can now listen to Fox News!
Since President Trump was re -elected, we have seen the first two weeks of any presidential period. But even according to Trump's standards, this Week meeting With Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, he cannot be considered unknown.
During his first term, their discussions produced Ibrahim's famous agreements.
This time, President Trump came out and said what no courageous American leader had to say since the Hamas terrorist attack on October 7, 2023: The United States is ready to escalate and play a leadership role in the Middle East to prevent such an attack from occurring again.
Trump suggested that the Gaza Strip seize a positive response through the administration
But the only way to ensure that history is not repeated is to break the model of failure that has been repeated for half a century and created a new template. President Trump's meeting With Netanyahu suggests that he intends to do so.
During those fifty years, America and others failed because of insisting that the Palestinians are nothing not: the nation -state. Without the solid institutions of the state, these efforts are proven sterile at best, a fact that has wandered in the inability to achieve the so -called alleged “solution” despite the insistence on the generations that must be.
Now President Trump takes a new hunting. He realizes the situation in Gaza It cannot be defended. In his joint press conference with Netanyahu last night, he announced his intention to start the United States' acquisition of the Gaza Strip, the transfer of the Palestinians temporarily, and the development of the war -torn area to the “Riviera in the Middle East”.
By doing this, President Trump presented what the international community (and many Americans on the political left) have been calling for him since the beginning of the war: a plan for the “next day” of the war in Gaza. Instead of rejecting this plan hysterically, the people who demanded it either should suggest or deal with it.
This proposal reflects Trump's design not to repeat his previous mistakes. Currently, GAZA lacks institutions to make the two -state solution applicable. Prevention that it exists will only lead to failure – which is unacceptable in a decisive area of Israel's security, which has already cost American taxpayers several billion dollars.
President Trump's position explains his understanding of this, in addition to his ability to identify a valuable piece when he sees one, especially one much less than its potential.
Critics are already discussing that President Trump's plan simply talks about the book “Talking” about the right -wing Israeli playing book, and that it represents “an anxious escalation of the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.”
But this is not at all what the president suggested. Instead, his goal is to rebuild Gaza As a place that is no longer a launching platform for terrorist attacks – something that will make it a better and safer place for the Palestinians to live if they choose to make this their future instead of remaining steeped by Hamas in a permanent victim.
On the one hand, these critics are some of the same people who predicted at the end of the world's virtual end Trump They announced the transfer of the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in 2017. With the certainty of what they claim now, they announced that this step will lead to the confusion of the Arab street, and Israel's neighbors will be forced to attack the Jewish state, whether they want it or not. Obviously, their allegations were not correct at the time, and there is no reason to assume that they will do now.
As, in this case, President Trump's decision proved that it is just talking points from the far right. Instead, the clarity brought by the move to the region about the American position within peace in Jerusalem, on the way to a broader peace than Ibrahim's agreements.
Today, President Trump expands this pattern more by providing what he presented to the Palestinians: peace through prosperity. It is for them to take.
