The new draft law of the two parties does not apply to protect children under the age of 13 years of harmful content on social media YouTube childrenWhat warns of parents' rights advocates of sexually transformers and DEI videos for minors?
He also considered the advocates of the parents who spoke to Fox News Digital, and he considered the children of the social media law, because of his restrictions on the algorithm, which indicates that the procedure constitutes “transcendence of the government.”
The draft law was presented by Sens. Brian SChatz, D-Hwaii, Ted Cruz, R-TEXAS, Chris Murphy and D-Conn. And Katie Brestt, R-AA, is expected to go to Mark-UP on Wednesday. In the online question and answers newspaper, the Chatz office said that Kids Youtube is not commensurate with the definition of social media under the invoice, and video games and other platforms such as wireless messages, educational platforms and a remote conference.
When visiting YouTube Kids, users are asked to determine whether they are a parent or a child. Parents tell that they must prepare an account for their children and they can block videos or channels that they do not like. Among the content available for children on the site are videos made by the creators “Queer”, including the Accounts Queer Kid Stuff, Nickelodeon and CBC Kids News. Another famous video center on Dei, such as explaining “regular racism” for children.
Social media applications are seen on a mobile device. (Jaap Arriens/Nurphoto via Getty Images)
“I don't think we should only exclude applications from checking because they say children in them. As you know, we are all aware of what is called confirmed gender care, and it is not useful or really care in any way you have learned that, right? Mothers of the co -founder of Liberty Tiffany Justice Tell Fox News Digital.
“What we have seen on YouTube children, I have seen a psychological personality, is evidence of feeding the sexual ideology of children,” she said. “We know that transitive activists are targeting children. We know that there are weak children who see this content. They often click on it. Sometimes, the algorithm will feed them more than this content. So I think it is very worrying. Not only do you want parents, this is dedicated to For children and everything is fine. ”
“We have always said that, mothers for freedom, we are not interconnected with the government,” Al -Adl said. “So I would really like to continue to tell parents that they need to participate. They need to be the ones who make these options.”
“There is a period of evidence of evidence that emerges in the United States shows that the so -called Sex assertion care She said that President Donald Trump's executive lawsuit “is bad for children,” and he is called on President Donald Trump's executive to remove gender ideology from classrooms. “This is a horrific message. Stopping natural and healthy development for children is criminal. Thus the idea that You have a website that nourishes the content of children about sex, ideology, or Dei is concerned.
I arrived at Fox News Digital, YouTube spokesperson, defended YouTube Kids but he did not address the legislative proposal directly.
“Kids Youtube puts parents in the driver's seat,” the spokesman said. “Parents can choose what their children see and what they do not see. They have control over the content that their children see and they can easily go to the application to arrange a list of the permitted channels only” preparation “.
Meanwhile, justice sheds light on the separate legislative measures presented by Senator Mike Lee, R-UTAH, to protect children over the Internet, including one bill that was presented in the last session that requires age verification in the application store.
Lee has not been included as a participant participant of the children's law outside social media, which would prevent social media platforms from allowing children under 13 years of age to create or maintain social media accounts, but it does not include providing parents ’approval. This law will not ask users to provide a government identifier to access social media and instead it requires social media companies to use data about their users, including the images they publish, the channels they follow or the date of birth they need when subscribing to determining whether it is The child is on his platform.
YouTube Kids logo is displayed on the mobile phone screen. (SOPA/Lightroctort via Getty Images)
As for other aspects of the children's law outside social media, justice said it is concerned that the draft law prohibits “strengthening the algorithm” for children under the age of 17. Under the draft law, social media platforms will not be able to use automatic learning exactly to follow up on the time it takes to see children and what they click on to find out what makes every individual child stay on the platform longer.
The Shatz office has argued that social media companies are using children for profit in this way, but justice said that its main interest is that the government controls the algorithm.
Al -Adl said: “If your son loves hockey, and gives you more hockey information, well, I do not know that it will get me up.” The algorithm “trains” to withdraw more conservative political content so that teenagers are exposed to another perspective outside the main media.
“So I think there are many questions about who controls the algorithm,” the justice said. “We know that there is often a really dangerous content that can affect the mental health of children. We have evidence of this. So we want to be really careful about how to use this algorithm. Once again, I do not know that I just want the government to take that Decisions for my family. ”
Fox News Digital, another parent's lawyer, told Parks Cat Parks, former Vice President of Texas Gop, that her primary interest with children outside social media is that “it represents an unnecessary government's transgression in a field that parents need to obtain final authority” “The real issue here is that it is the parents who need to inform them of being able to make the right decisions for their children, not something imposed by the government,” Parks said.
“As a parent, I am very involved in the presence of my son online and I agree on the platforms that are allowed to interact with. So what I do not want, I do not want the government to be able to strip my ability to my child and Parks said:
YouTube application logo is displayed on the iPhone in the Apple store. (LightroctroTy images)
Justice argued that the officials on parents to protect their children from harmful content, and although there may be a role for the government, “it is really a kind of mystery in relation to what this role is.”
“We know that the algorithm is addicted,” she said. “I know that he wants you to continue passing and feeding you with more information that you think you are interested in. It's just a question about what this information is now – the ideology of transgenderly, the ideology of sex. We are working to wipe it out of the map.
“I don't want the government to be my child's father,” she added. “They have a father, which is great, and we will make good decisions for our children together.”
Most applications You have age restrictionsBut the Chatz office was martyred in the UK 2023 organizational study, which found approximately 40 % of children between the ages of 8-12 who are still using social media platforms.
In the Questions and Answers Document, the Shatz office also said that the bill “does not prevent LGBTQ youth from accessing relevant online resources.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
“We have worked closely with LGBTQ+ groups with the formulation of this legislation to ensure this law does not negatively affect this society,” said newspaper. “Under this bill, children will continue to search for positive content and display this information in a time brief. Moreover, this law will not affect access to platforms such as web sites run by non -profit organizations, direct correspondence services, remote conferences, educational sites, Among other things.
