Immigration Research Tank has suggested a unique way to help President Donald Trump Deportation efforts, with the completion of typical enforcement efforts by relying on “Snitches” to reduce employment opportunities for illegal immigrants.
Migration Studies Center (CIS) Release In detail, a plan to force “self -sending” for illegal immigrants. The proposal indicates a slight amendment to the tax law that aims to punish employers who employ illegal immigrants by allowing ordinary citizens to prosecute the companies that do this, forcing them to comply with the electronic identification system and reduce employment opportunities for migrants.
The proposal, which Ajay Gobta, is composed, admits to replace Trump's enforcement, but he argues that the president will be “limited in the range” when it comes to traditional deportation methods, which can be completed by forcing a lot Illegal immigrants To leave the country voluntarily.
“Despite its shock and dread, it is unlikely that the motivation for forced deportation has been achieved in this vast population,” the report says. “For this, the law must be applied against the employment of these foreigners.”
The report is cited the nineteenth century plan for Britain to eliminate children's work as an example of the success of the concept, noting that the country was able to impose compliance with labor laws even though it was limited to budget resources and restrictions.
The report notes that Britain's efforts depend on the enforcement of the law, which will also be done by the American proposal by allowing ordinary citizens to prosecute employers from illegal immigrants.
The report says: “The proposal will impose a punitive tax on all those who pay in exchange for personal services or the work of unauthorized foreigners and allow ordinary citizens to prosecute this tax.” “It is likely that the spread of the hair, compared to the remote possibility of government work, is the fear of God in employers. Most of them, if not everyone, will embrace good mind, a free online tool to verify the employment of potential work mandate.”
According to the report, the result will make it difficult for illegal immigrants to obtain a job, which “should stimulate large numbers of foreigners who are not authorized to return home.”
The proposal of the Association of Independent Countries is not the first time late. Mitt Romney, Ra RounaHe called for a similar procedure during his 2012 presentation of the presidency.
“The answer is the decision of the self, which people decide that they can do better work by returning home because they cannot find a job here because they do not have legal documents to allow them to work here,” Romney said during a primary Republican discussion. In 2012.
Romney's proposal was widely mocked at the time, including Trump, who called the idea of ”obsessed” and “crazy”, according to a 2012 journalistic report.
But the idea of Romney was also high -level defenders, including Senator in Florida Marco RubioWho is now working in the Trump administration as a state minister.
Click here for more immigration coverage
“I never understood to report the self, while the ruler presented it as a policy. It is not a policy.” “I think it is a note of what people will do in a country that imposes immigration laws.”
According to the report of the Association of Independent Countries, a renewed batch can be achieved in order to send the self by amending the current tax law through reconciliation in the budget, which only requires a simple majority vote in the Senate and may exceed democratic efforts to prevent legislation.
Click here to get the Fox News app
“Today, Republicans have the legislative and executive authority to implement the proposal fully here. This implementation will require the addition of more than 650 words to a budget settlement bill. It will force all employers at the country level to comply with electronic inspection,” and concluded the report of the Association of Independent Countries.
“If the lawmakers of the Republican Party in each of the two congressional rooms refrain even from this legislative task, their voters will be justified in the conclusion that they are given a higher priority for not putting the minimum additional burden on employers more than they do in removing illegal foreigners.”