Referee Sean Hoshouli tended to football fans at Qaed 12, Section 3, Article 4 of the American Football Association’s rules book.
Hacholi threatened to give Philadelphia Eagles Automatic landing after Washington's leaders committed three consecutive penalties in the goal line during the NFC tournament.
Washington Dahir Frankie Lovu launched himself twice-the simulation of Superman in the middle of the trip-he dives on the quarrel line before the eagles took the ball in the single square line. Lovo was trying to prevent the Eagles player Galen hurting infiltration into the end area behind his huge men.
Hochuli slides the ball closer to the goal line after each violation. “Half of the distance to the goal line” is the punishment, which means that the ball advanced a few centimeters at a time and Philadelphia got a new set of landing. But after the second violation, Hochuli announced that it would make Lovo a non -sporting penalty if he did it again.
Lovo did not.
But in the third play, the defense in Washington Jonathan Allen jumped shortly before the match.
Hochuli dawn the whistle, evaluated the punishment of the infringement and transferred the ball forward until it practically accepted its nose.
Unlike football, there is no mysterious and baked rule that allows critics to “unfairly unfair” currency to replace it-which may spoil hard luck for President Trump's freezing of federal funds that have already been allocated. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Then the ruling taught the nation on one of the most mysterious rules in any sports rules book.
“Washington has been notified that the rulers can give the result if this type of behavior occurred again,” said Hocholi.
The rule announces the following:
“The player or the alternative to play should not interfere by any unfair act. Punishment: As for an unfair action specifically: his eligibility may not be eligible. The referee, after consulting the expatriate crew, imposes any punishment remotely like this from any symbol punishment Another specific.
The political storm that is about to sing the Capitol Hill
In short, if Washington committed another penalty, Hoguli could have left the ball crawl towards the goal line. He had just gave the eagles six points on the results board.
Article 12, Article 3, Article 4 is not present in governance or politics. With the exception of voters, there is no ruling like Sean Hocholi to assess penalties, and to reach discipline and yields.
This disturbs the Democrats – and some Republicans – when it comes to Trump administration It moves to freeze the money allocated by Congress in all fields.
Article 1, Article 9 of the Constitution makes the authorization of spending powers very clear – this is a great reason that makes the government efficiency management in Elon Musk very controversial in Capitol Hill. (Anna Moneymaker)
Article 1, Article 9 of the constitution is clear about any branch of the government that controls the portfolio chains:
“No money from the treasury will be extracted, but as a result of the credits offered by the law.”
In other words, Congress is responsible for spending money. The executive branch cannot be frustrated by one side what Congress spends. President Richard Nixon tried this in the mid -seventies of the last century with “reservation”. The Nixon administration prevented the spending of money allocated by Congress.
Musk's Doge targets the Federal Agency “Nest's Nest” with the global imprint
That is why Elon Musk The Ministry of Governmental efficiency or “Doug” is very controversial. First of all, it is not a “administration” like the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the Ministry of Energy. It is really a “US Doge”, which is placed under the umbrella of a small agency within the executive branch: American digital service.
But President Trump gave Elon Musk and his team to reach the investigation methods to reduce spending. DOGE service can not only reduce spending on its own. At least it is not constitutional. Certainly, another agency, such as the United States Agency for International Development, cannot eliminate the United States Agency for International Development.
Unless Congress does not say that.
The majority leader of the Senate John Thun, RS. (Getty Images)
For this reason the drama last week about automatic freezing on grants and federal loans shook legislators from both sides Capitol Hill. It was granted, the administration called for a “temporary” stop. Even some powerful Republicans were fine with that.
“I think this normal practice is at the beginning of the administration so that we have an opportunity to know how to spend money,” said John Thun, the majority leader of the Senate. “I think this is just an initial step I think most of the departments take it.”
But Congress generally protects its powers from spending closely. It will be remarkable to the legislators to outperform the financial responsibilities of the executive authority without fighting.
The political storm that is about to sing the Capitol Hill
For this reason, when granted a restricted order to cancel the movements by the administration to the authority of Congress in spending, the American boycott judge, Lauren Alejhan, announced that there is a “irreplaceable harm” possibility of federal agencies and that the administration's actions may be “catastrophic”.
Republicans raised a few infiltrators about administration decisions. But Democrats and their allies have clarified the danger of circumstances.
“This is a deep constitutional issue,” said Senator Angus King, I am Maine. “What happened last night is the most direct attack on the authority of Congress, and I believe in the history of the United States. It is starkly unconstitutional. Article Two does not grant power to define budgets or expenses that are created in the three article in Congress.”
The closure of the United States Agency for International Development, or the United States Agency for International Development, stopped the anger of many Democrats in the House of Representatives and the Senate. (Celel Gunes/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
The United States Agency for International Development was closed on Monday and employees were closed from the computer system. Musk said that the agency should be closed.
Democrats in the House of Representatives and the Senate went to the headquarters of the United States Agency for International Development in Washington on Monday to protest the move of Doug and Musk.
“If you want to change an agency, submit a draft law and pass a law. You cannot wave a agency you do not like,” said Senator Brian Shatz, de Hawaii.
“Just like Elon Musk did not create the US Agency for International Development, he has no ability to destroy him,” said MP Jimmy Raskin, DMD, the Great Democrat at the Credit Committee in the House of Representatives. “We do not have a fourth branch of the government called Elon Musk.”
The administration's movements were last week and over the end of the weekend to write down the spending powers in Congress so terrible that the Democrats might have been hoping that the referee Sean Hocholi would be present to give them the result. Democrats claimed that this step was beyond the pale that might be qualified as “specifically unfair”. They may say that the maneuvers were so constitutional that they should give Democrats a “degree”.
Foreign Minister Marco Rubio He declared himself head of the US International Development Agency.
“They are supposed to take the political direction from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and do not do so. Their position is that they do not have to answer us. This is not true and this will not be.”
Foreign Minister Marco Rubio himself announced the new head of the US Agency for International Development, claiming that “their position is that they do not have to answer (the Ministry of Foreign Affairs). This is not true and this will not be the case,” (AP Photo/Mark Schiesfelbein, Swimming Path)
During the appearance of the fox, Parliament Speaker Mike JohnsonR-La said, it was impeccable to find savings to pay the costs of the suspended renewal of Trump tax discounts.
“We have to find these savings,” Johnson said. “We will get huge savings by making the government more efficient and effective.”
The Chairman of the Transport Committee in the House of Representatives, Sam Gravs, R-MO, indicated that he was hearing from government transportation departments, in an attempt to understand the programs that were now suspended.
The political storm that is about to sing the Capitol Hill
“A lot of money has been frozen,” Graves said. “There are some programs that the president and the Congress do not want to move forward, and we need to adjust many of these programs.”
A deadline for government financing waving on the horizon in about five weeks. With their narrow majority, it is generally believed that Republicans may need the help of Democrats to keep the government open. However, Democrats may now be renewed because they believe that the members of the Republican Party may be ready to waive the authority to spend on the executive authority.
Senator Patti Murray, D-WASH. , It is the largest Democrats in the credits committee. She asks what is happening if the two sides reach an agreement. “This administration says that this is the bed. We do not have to go to that.”
Senator Patty Murray asked, d. (Anna Rose Leiden/Swimming pool via Reuters)
“The level of confidence is at the lowest levels I have seen here in Congress,” Murray added.
In politics, there is no judgment. There will be lawsuits. Court challenges. The battles that will be angry for years.
But it is up to the voters to determine whether what the Trump administration is now is “specifically unfair.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
The voters will not have the opportunity to give the result until November next year as soon as possible.
