After President Donald Trump A controversial executive in an attempt to end the newborn citizenship For the children of illegal immigrants, many Senate Republicans submitted a bill that would reform American law to complete this exactly.
Entitled Citizenship Law in 2025, “ The draft law will completely end the practice of granting citizenship to people born in the United States from parents, either illegal foreigners or in the country legally on a temporary basis. The draft law was presented in the Senate on January 31 by the Republic. Lindsey Graham from South Carolinaand Katie Brett from Alabama and Ted Cruz from Texas.
The draft laws of the law said in a statement that this procedure will address what they launched “one of the largest magnets for illegal immigration”, which they believe is a weakness in national security.
Trump, who ends the citizenship born to illegal immigrants, is constitutional, says the expert
Senator Lindsey Graham, RS. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite)
The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) estimates that there are 33,000 births in the United States annually. The Association of Independent States also estimates that there are hundreds of thousands of births for illegal or foreign foreigners on temporary visas.
Report 2022 of the Senate Internal Security Committee and Government Affairs It revealed the presence of many “Born Tourism” Companies in the United States, including one called “Miami Mama” that meets the needs of wealthy Russian customers who are looking for a legal status in the United States
“The United States has long been late to change its policy of rights because it was abused in many ways,” Graham said in a statement on Friday.
He referred to the practice of birth, which he said enables “the wealthy individuals from China and other countries to come to the United States just to have a child who will be an American citizen.”
Nearly two states that Trump suggests the supervisor of citizenship generator: “unprecedented”
A man plays with a child while waiting with other migrants from Venezuela near a bus station after being released from the United States border nursery in El Passo, Texas, United States, September 13, 2022. (Reuters/Jose Luis Gonzalez)
“When you look at the magnet that attracts people to America, the newly born citizenship is one of the largest citizenship,” Graham said. “I also appreciate President Trump's executive to treat sex in the field of birth. It is time for the United States to match the rest of the world and restrict this practice once and forever.”
Currently, the usual practice in the United States is to grant automatic citizenship to all children born on American soil. This was the practice only since the 1960s and is based on what some believe is a flawed interpretation of the fourteenth modification, which reads that “all people born or naturalized in the United States, and are subject to the jurisdiction, are citizens of the United States and the country in which they reside.”
In 2025, the Citizenship Law would make it clear that, in order to fulfill the “subject to the jurisdiction”, the person born in the United States must have at least one of the parents, the national, permanent, or foreign resident, legal or foreign resident that serves in the American army. In actual service.
The law clarifies that it will not affect the nationality of any person born before the law is passed and will not restrict the citizenship of the newlyweds in the United States.
22 countries challenge the “non -constitutional” citizenship of Trump
US President Donald Trump speaks with the US Border President Rodney Scott (PBUH) while participating in a ceremony marking 200 miles from the border wall on the international border with Mexico in Saint -Luis, Arizona, June 23, 2020. (Saul Lub/Avenue)
Click here for more immigration coverage
This comes after Trump signed an executive order entitled “Protecting the meaning and value of American citizenship” on his first day in office. The order, which has been temporarily banned from the court’s ruling, was ordered to direct government agencies to refrain from issuing any documents that recognize the citizenship of any children born in the United States to illegal and temporary immigrants.
Hans von Spacovsky, a great legal colleague at the Heritage Corporation, told the Fox News Digital that he believed, “If this case reaches the Supreme Court, it is very likely that the court will be, if the court applies the actual amendment text and looks at its legislative date – what the project sponsors said The law at the time – its own precedents are followed in the three cases that were considered in this case, then they will be judged in favor of Trump.
“The most important point here is that this bill does not try to amend the fourteenth amendment,” he said. “It simply explains the meaning of the fourteenth modification conditions.”
“I think it is important for Congress to reaffirm what he said when I first sponsored the fourteenth amendment: that the phrase” subject to the jurisdiction “will not apply to an illegal foreign child in the United States and there, when he is born, a citizen of the child's parents, and thus It is not subject to the authority of the United States, ”continued. “The current statute, 8 USC 1401, simply repeats the fourteenth amendment language. It has been completely interpreted in recent decades by those who mistakenly say that amendment and federal law require birth in the United States only.”
that it. Katie Brett, RC (Kevin Lietsch/Getty Images)
Eching the language used in Trump, Brett said, “The promise of American citizenship should not stimulate illegal immigration, but this is exactly what happened for a very long time.”
Click here to get the Fox News app
“It is time to fix this,” said Brett. “Senator Lindsay Graham and the law of citizenship in the field of births will highlight President Trump's logical position and end the abuse of vertical citizenship that I do not think is consistent with the original meaning of the citizenship deal in the fourteent Throughout the world.
This comes after the Chairman of the Science and Technology Committee in the House of Representatives, Brian Babin, R-TEXAS, presented a draft law on January 21 to clarify that the fourteenth amendment does not include children for those who are in the country illegally or on a temporary basis.
