IndiaDecision to submit Harshit Rana As an alternative to concussion Chevam Dub During the fourth T20i against England in Bonnic It sparked a major debate in the world of cricket.
Controversy about the inclusion of Harchit Rana as an alternative to concussion
The match saw Dubi playing a pivotal role, as it destroyed 53 out of 34 balls, as India set a total of 18/9. However, in the final match of India's roles, DUBE was hit on the helmet by a Craig Overton The guard, forcing him to leave the field under concussion protocols. In a move since a great scrutiny, India replaced by India with Harshit RanaMedium speed soccer player, instead of an almost similar founder.
Rana has instantly caused an immediate effect, with 33 wins in the 33rd match over his first appearance in T20i. His decisive penetration – including Liam Levingstone, Jacob Bethael and Craig Overton -India Bowl England helped out for 166, where he won 15. With this victory, India advanced 3-1 in the series before the Mumbai final. Captain England Jose Petler He did not retract the question of India's move, saying that Rana was not a similar alternative to Dubai.
Ravenicran Ashwin's position on India's decision
Indian rotation legend Ravenicandran Ashwen He now expressed his strong rejection of the decision, as he criticized both the match officials and the Indian team's treatment of the situation. Speaking to his channel on YouTube, Ashwain did not overlook his words, comparing the decision to the IPL influence player instead of organizing international cricket.
“The game has been finished. India capture another chain at home. T20i was the real tyrant to win. What was this game? It was like a replica of the iPL. Supersub was there, and the game was played with an influence player.” Ashwin commented, expressing his lack of belief on the situation.
He also referred to the incident of replacement of concussion in 2020 in Canberra, where Yozfandra, Shal, replaced Ravindra Jadiga, came after the latter suffered from concussion. Ashwin noted that at least in this case, the roundabout was replaced by another rotation, making it a reasonable decision. On the contrary, bringing one of the striking institutions like DUBE is completely unjustified.
“The entire discussion revolves around how Harchit Rana came as an alternative to concussion Dubi. Did we forget that it was an international match and played the IPL match? I can understand. It happened in the past. . The 38 -year -old stated.
Also read: Has India followed the international criminal court rules in replacing Chef Dubi with Harchit Rana during 4th T20i against England? Make up
Ashwin perspective on Ramandip Singh as a possible alternative
Ashwin strongly criticized the officials of the match, on the pretext of that Ramandip SinghOne of the founders of the beating was an ideal alternative for DUBE, but was ignored. Ashwin also emphasized that this decision represents a dangerous precedent, as it can allow the teams to exploit the concussion base in future matches.
“Here, Harshett came to Dubi. There is no role for the Indian team England or England. If there is no one in the team, you can say that Harshit Rana can a little bats and Chevam Duby can shine a little. For this reason we brought him. He sits abroad. Look at this, “” Ashwain concluded.
